Modified from Oswalt, Bible Among the Myths, p 65. |
A friend of
mine posted this question in response to the previous blog, "How can God
know what will happen before it happens?" "You're arguing for God's
transcendence, yet also insisting God is immanent. I know theologians in the
past have argued for both of these, yet most theologians now recognize the
irreconcilable contradiction of these two. What's your defense?" This is
an excellent question and I would like to explain my views concerning these two
areas.
Both
transcendence and immanence describe God’s relationship to the universe. The
relationship between transcendent God and the universe is that God created the
universe and is separate in that He is not made of the material of the universe
(Ps. 19). He is independent of creation (Grudem, pg 267). He is the cause of
the universe.
The
transcendence of God stems from his omnipotence. God is infinite, whereas all
creation is finite, thus God is separate from creation. Genesis 1-2, the
beginning of the Bible, demonstrates the transcendence of God, because God
created all that exists now within this finite realm. To truly understand the
transcendence, a short detour to explain the opposite is in order.
Transcendence
defies the ancient beliefs, which consist of continuity. Continuity is deity,
humanity, and nature coexisting within the same realm, much as modern day
pantheism sees it. This idea teaches that all things exist because they are
intrinsically a part of each other ("The Bible Among the Myths" by
John Oswalt, ch. 2). This is seen in ancient myths, Egyptian, Canaanite, and
Mesopotamian theogonies of 1000 - 4000 BC, which coincides with the backdrop of
the Old Testament yet stand in stark contrast.
Modified from Oswalt, Bible Among the Myths, p. 48 |
Transcendence within the Bible stands in stark contrast to the view of continuity within ANE religions. Within the idea of myth,
cosmos and gods are linked; however, within the Old Testament's unique view,
God is separate and prior to the cosmos. The Bible provides a unified set of
rules, a high view of humanity as the crown of creation, monotheism at the core
of scripture, images/idols are forbidden, and sexuality is denied as a part of
worship. Humanity and nature coexist with each other; however, God is separate
in that God is not a part what was created. Thus, God is within nature, but NOT
of nature.
Because God is
within nature in the essence that He continues to act throughout history, but
does not exist as a part of created nature, this is what is known as immanence.
The relationship between God’s immanence and created nature is
that God continues to move within nature while not being a physical part of the
created nature. Genesis 1:2, stating the Spirit of God was moving across the waters, shows how
God was personally involved within creation, but the Bible does not stop here.
Hebrews 1:3 and Col. 1:17 both argue that God is the sustaining cause of the
universe. If God were to completely remove Himself from creation, it would
cease to exist. God’s personal involvement is the key focus behind immanence,
in that God is not some distant deity (Deism), nor is God limited to the
universe (pantheism).
God’s immanence
is further demonstrated through the many periods in time where God, via either
anthropomorphism or the incarnation itself, has crossed the boundaries of the
ethereal and has become physical, yet this does not limit God to the law that
He becomes bound by creation. John 1 argues that God became flesh, and dwelt
among us, thus God became immanent in the fullest sense, yet God was not born
of two human parents, for the Holy Spirit was a part of the consummation
removing the sin nature defying the laws of the universe.
Miracles also
attest to the immanence of God. Throughout history, God has enabled miracles to
occur that defy physical laws bound by nature. Whether it is a miraculous
healing, turning water into wine, the plagues of Egypt (which was a polemical
attack against the deities of Egypt), or creation itself, God continues to work
within nature while not being bound by nature. Thus, God is immanent, yet
transcendent.
Thank you for the wonderful article on Immanence & Transcendence. I learnt much...I have a thought on the the Holy Spirit being somehow involved in the birth of Christ, I believe that He(HS) did not remove the sin nature. Else it would have made Christ less human, more diety and unaffected by sin. Therefore it would go against the necessity for his death and sacrifice over the sins of the world. I believe sin was real and would have been near Him, yet He chose by choice to not sin. Please share your thoughts.
ReplyDelete